fbpx
Sunday, August 9th, 2020
Home » Uncategorized » BREAKING: Cruise ship off San Francisco riddled with coronavirus. 21 cases so far.
Photo from helocopter hovering over moving cruise ship
The 129th Rescue Wing of the California National Guard delivered coronavirus test kits Thursday to the Grand Princess, a San Francisco-bound cruise ship carrying 3,400 people that officials held for a second day off the coast of California as they plan how to deal with passengers and crew members who may be infected.

BREAKING: Cruise ship off San Francisco riddled with coronavirus. 21 cases so far.

PortandTerminal.com, March 6, 2020

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Passengers and crews of the cruise ship Grand Princess off San Francisco Bay have tested positive for coronavirus.

Vice President Mike Pence says 21 people aboard a mammoth cruise ship off the California coast have tested positive for the new coronavirus, including 19 crew members. Pence said Friday that the federal government is working with California officials on a plan to bring the ship to a non-commercial port this weekend.

All 3,500 passengers and crew members will all need to be tested for the virus.

Earlier today, a number of testing kits were flown to the ship by helicopter.

Authorities need to do three things now

One. Test the remaining passengers on board the massive cruise ship to see how big the problem they are dealing with is. That’s going to take time and more testing kits which have been in short supply.

Two. Get passengers off of the ship and into land-based quarantines. The fiasco of the Diamond Princess quarantine showed that on board isolation does not work. In that recent quarantine incident off of the coast of Japan, 705 of the passengers and crew on board came down with the virus. It is still unclear how the virus spread during the quarantine, but it did. There can be no repeat of that deadly mistake.

READ: Americans evacuated from virus-hit cruise ship

Three. Governments need to ask some hard questions about blocking ALL cruise ships now from their ports. This is already happening in a haphazard fashion in some ports globally. It needs to be formalized into policy. Yes, this will cause massive financial losses to the industry and yes many of America’s ports and they will need support to get through it. Is there really a viable alternative at this moment to not shutting the ports to cruise ships?

READ: On April 8 the 1st cruise ship is due at the Port of Boston. What’s the COVID19 plan?

Other articles you may find interesting

Copyright © 2019 PortandTerminal.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.

Check Also

Steam rises from a Syncrude Canada Ltd. facility in the Athabasca oil sands north of Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, on Friday, June 14, 2019. Once the booming heart of the country's energy industry, the little city of 75,000 in northeastern Alberta has become a showcase for the debt troubles many Canadians are facing. Photographer: Amber Bracken/Bloomberg

Joblessness Seen Tripling to 25% or More in Canada Oil Heartland

BLOOMBERG, APRIL 7, 2020 Alberta premier says 500,000 could be put out of work | …

Line up of trucks carrying shipping containers

Calculating Costs of Shutting Borders to Trade: Extreme is scenario -48% GDP

BLOOMBERG, March 23, 2020 What if we had to close the US border to trade …